About

The deliberate Public Interest Commitments (PIC) have a long and miserable history at ICANN. They were a procedure never made or assessed by the Multistakeholder procedure, put together for one reason and permitted to transform into a component for a practically boundless number of un-checked on different purposes. Questions are appointed to a goals procedure which itself was never assessed for an) its fittingness to the job that needs to be done, b) its failure to toss out wrong cases or strange private duties, and c) and was completely unvetted for the human rights, free articulation, protection and related issues that may come its direction.

Private (intentional) PICs and the related PIC contest goals process (PICDRP) isn't even an insane thought; it's an unbaked thought. Albeit private PICs have been classified "intentional jabber" and "willful trash" (see underneath), they are as yet remembered for new gTLD vault understandings, and obviously being grasped and energized by Ethos Capital and PIR as a major aspect of their .ORG contract. The pioneers and counselors of Ethos and PIR — Fadi Chehadé, Allen Grogan and Jon Nevett — encourage us to "trust them" and utilize private PIC duties and procedures as the premise of all securities for .ORG registrants (and the .ORG people group that depends on them). I'm heartbroken, however there is little to trust in the PIC procedure.

In view of the historical backdrop of the private PICs, it strains believability to accept that we would endow the security of the support of noncommercial discourse on the web — .ORG area names — to the wreckage of strategies and techniques these people assisted with making in 2013 and 2014. Right now, spread out the profoundly concerning history of private PICs and the PICDRP. I additionally present that private PICs are not the most ideal approach to secure the .ORG registrants and network, however the most self-serving path for PIR and Ethos to push ahead — there are more clear, more grounded, and progressively direct approaches to ensure .ORG registrants and individuals from the .ORG people group. In the event that this exchange is to push ahead, it is these alternatives we have to consolidate. I depict them toward the end.

(Note: I compose this piece as a component of the gathering that established ICANN and an individual from ICANN multistakeholder groups that drafted all around characterized and well-checked principles for space name contest forms for the Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy (UDRP) and Uniform Rapid Suspension framework (URS); I am co-seat of the working gathering presently investigating these question forms. I am a previous chief of strategy for the Public Interest Registry who discovered working with .ORG registrants and .ORG people group to be a respect and benefit each day; it is the main gTLD I know where registrants normally hazard their lives, and those of their families, to share data about tyrannies and debasement, abuse and misrepresentation, and to battle for opportunity, news, instruction and data. Albeit uncommon for a blog piece, I use endnotes to record my sources.)